It would certainly seem that at this point in time, it would be a good idea to take a good hard look at the issues at hand with an eye towards focusing on trying to find an overall understanding of the circumstances of the matter in which we presently find ourselves, so that in order to move forward from here with integrity, central to the matter, in the course of impacting and not acting too soon, because this is not the time, it's too early and we have to guard against special interests while you and I seek answers and ultimately people won't be fooled and it'll be the hugest, biggest, best, I'll tell you that and everyone's saying it and thousands of people tell me every day and you won't believe it, nobody can believe it because it's never been done before and it all comes down to not giving up and then one thing leads to another and nature takes its course and above all let's not jump to conclusions.
Apparently, the fact that you needed to know was not known at the time that the now known need to know was known, therefore those that needed to advise and inform perhaps felt the information he needed as to whether to inform the highest authority of the known information was not yet known and therefore there was no authority for the authority to be informed because the need to know was not, at that time, known or needed.
Well, it's clear that the we agreed that your new policy is a really excellent plan but in view of some of the doubts being expressed, may I propose that I recall that after careful consideration, the considered view of us all was that while they considered that the proposal met with broad approval in principle, that some of the principles were sufficiently fundamental in principle and some of the considerations so complex and finely balanced in practice, that, in principle, it was proposed that the sensible and prudent practice would be to submit the proposal for more detailed consideration, laying stress on the essential continuity of the new proposal with existing principles, and the principle of the principle arguments which the proposal proposes and propounds for their approval, in principle.
After careful consideration and soul searching for an example of the kind of thing for which your question is seeking, and after having read and digested the results upon this page and seeing not your among them, yet maintaining still the remnants of a desire to include such a question of this imagining from the mind, but not having the means with which to obscure my intent on answering such a query, my fancy having flitted to points unknown and beyond which I cannot easily nor frankly retrieve the impetus from whence I have mounted my quest and mission, I herein and below on the bottom of this answer insert my thoughts.
Trying to recover here, for recognition, I see that it must have consisted not at all in any idea, in any flash, upon the fancy, of a set of relations, or in any one of those situations that, by a logic of their own, immediately fall, but altogether in the sense of a single character, the character and aspect of a particular engaging idea, to which all the usual elements of a subject, certainly of a setting were added.
If you ask me for a straight answer, then I should say that as far as we can see, looking at it, by and large, taking one time with another in terms of the average of all, then in the final analysis, it is probably true to say that at the end of the day in general terms, you’d probably find that, not to put too fine a point on it, there wasn’t probably much weight in it in one way or the other, as far as one can see at this stage.